Welcome! This forum is for USAPLTM and IPF members, coaches and supporters to discuss USAPL and IPF issues. Non-members are welcome. Please follow these few guidelines:
  1. Use an email address. (Only moderators can view it)
  2. No spam/advertisements. USAPL meet notices are ok.
  3. No personal attacks.
  4. No federation bashing.
  5. Keep bad language to a minimum.
The views and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of the USAPLTM.


  


PowerLines
The Official USAPL Electronic Newsletter


| USA Powerlifting | International Powerlifting Federation |

The Unofficial USAPL Powerlifting Forum!

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Re: Siders is not going to Norway

Posted By: Garry Holmen
Date: Monday, 16 October 2006, at 7:12 a.m.

In Response To: Re: Siders is not going to Norway (Regina Hackney)

> Let me see if I have this right, we have an
> elite lifter who ask to break the rules and
> was apparently given permission to break the
> rule by someone who may not have had the
> authority to do so.

I don't get this... Is the IPF president suspended because of his actions? No. The lifter whom acted in good faith and contacted the proper person gets the suspension.

Members of the DC were CC'ed on Nobert's response. Did they email back and say "No that isn't sufficient Norbert/Siders?"

> Then someone else caught this and said no he
> should not have gotten the ok to lift where
> the rules say he shouldn't.

Caught this? They were cc'ed on it. It was their moment to step up and correct this before the event happened. Did they? No. They failed as much as the IPF president did.

And yes they should be suspended too.

> Seems to me that the IPF is saying the elite
> do not get special treatment. isn't that what
> we all want to be treated equally?

If that is true Regina why are the other USAPL lifters who lifted at the USPF meet where Coan was at not suspended as well?

What we have here is a lifter who asked for clarification on a rule, received guidance from the highest levels in the IPF, followed that guidance to the letter and then was vicitimized by back-room politics.

Explain to me slowly how this is the fair, respectful and equal treatment that you advocated above?

Garry

Password:

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

USAPL Powerlifting Forum is maintained by Administrator with BBB .

The views and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of the USAPL.