Re: The IPF rules aren't valid

Welcome! This forum is for USAPL^TM and IPF members, coaches and supporters to discuss USAPL and IPF issues. Non-members are welcome. Please follow these few guidelines:

Use an email address. (Only moderators can view it)
No spam/advertisements. USAPL meet notices are ok.
No personal attacks.
No federation bashing.
Keep bad language to a minimum.

The views and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of the USAPL^TM.

PowerLines
The Official USAPL Electronic Newsletter

| USA Powerlifting | International Powerlifting Federation |

The Unofficial USAPL Powerlifting Forum!

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Posted By: Larry Miller
Date: Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 6:22 a.m.
In Response To: Re: The IPF rules aren't valid (Eliot Feldman)

Elliot,
You stated the rule was passed last month. Has it not been in the books for a long time? How was the rule amended?
Again, I refer back to the Ernie Frantz lawsuit. It held up once in the US legal system. What makes you think that a USA PL athlete who is suspended by the IPF for lifting in another meet will not result in a lawsuit against the IPF and be upheld as it was years ago.
Do you think that the IPF wants this to happen again?
Larry

Password:

Messages In This Thread
The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry Miller -- Friday, 16 December 2005, at 5:03 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eliot Feldman -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 2:02 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry Miller -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 6:22 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eliot Feldman -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 8:46 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Lars Lindeberg -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 7:27 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 7:50 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jack Marcus -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 5:02 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 8:07 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Nectar Kirkiris -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 9:09 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 1:56 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Nectar Kirkiris -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:30 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:54 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 3:10 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Tuesday, 20 December 2005, at 6:42 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
John Hanson -- Thursday, 22 December 2005, at 5:13 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Tuesday, 3 January 2006, at 7:10 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid *LINK*
Michael Abramson -- Tuesday, 10 January 2006, at 9:18 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 6:55 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:19 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:28 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:51 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:55 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jack Marcus -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:28 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:58 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eric Stone -- Wednesday, 21 December 2005, at 5:28 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Mike Hara -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 4:09 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eliot Feldman -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 1:27 a.m.

ADMIN! why Larry why?
Jason Burnell -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 12:15 p.m.

Re: why Larry why? *LINK*
Regina Hackney -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 1:05 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry Miller -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 8:29 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Regina Hackney -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 10:50 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry Miller -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 6:48 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Regina Hackney -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:20 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:22 a.m.

Because he's got a problem...
Phil Nebby -- Friday, 23 December 2005, at 3:13 p.m.

Re: Because he's got a problem...
Larry Miller -- Friday, 23 December 2005, at 4:18 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 7:24 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Jason Burnell -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 3:30 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:13 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Jason Burnell -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:38 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:05 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:30 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:59 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 3:17 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Tuesday, 20 December 2005, at 6:22 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Tuesday, 20 December 2005, at 7:55 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:09 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jason Burnell -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:29 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:55 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jason Burnell -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 10:51 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Regina Hackney -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:58 a.m.

Nope...
Eric Stone -- Wednesday, 21 December 2005, at 5:32 p.m.

Re: Nope...
Garry Holmen -- Thursday, 22 December 2005, at 8:16 a.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

USAPL Powerlifting Forum is maintained by Administrator with BBB .
The views and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of the USAPL.