Re: The IPF rules aren't valid

Welcome! This forum is for USAPL^TM and IPF members, coaches and supporters to discuss USAPL and IPF issues. Non-members are welcome. Please follow these few guidelines:

Use an email address. (Only moderators can view it)
No spam/advertisements. USAPL meet notices are ok.
No personal attacks.
No federation bashing.
Keep bad language to a minimum.

The views and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of the USAPL^TM.

PowerLines
The Official USAPL Electronic Newsletter

| USA Powerlifting | International Powerlifting Federation |

The Unofficial USAPL Powerlifting Forum!

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Posted By: Larry "Iron" Smith
Date: Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 8:07 p.m.
In Response To: Re: The IPF rules aren't valid (Jack Marcus)

The IPF was sued under the Clayton Act. I don't know if the IPF consulted a lawyer or not about their chances of wining but if they did, a good lawyer would advice them of their chances. I agree with you that it is not a good idea to waste a lot of money if your chances are poor. Also it was probably impossible to predict back then how long this ruling would prevent the IPF from holding meets in the USA. But they would be foolish to let another case develop along the same lines at the present time.

Password:

Messages In This Thread
The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry Miller -- Friday, 16 December 2005, at 5:03 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eliot Feldman -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 2:02 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry Miller -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 6:22 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eliot Feldman -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 8:46 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Lars Lindeberg -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 7:27 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 7:50 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jack Marcus -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 5:02 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 8:07 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Nectar Kirkiris -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 9:09 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 1:56 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Nectar Kirkiris -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:30 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:54 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 3:10 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Tuesday, 20 December 2005, at 6:42 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
John Hanson -- Thursday, 22 December 2005, at 5:13 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Tuesday, 3 January 2006, at 7:10 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid *LINK*
Michael Abramson -- Tuesday, 10 January 2006, at 9:18 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 6:55 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:19 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:28 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:51 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:55 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jack Marcus -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:28 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:58 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eric Stone -- Wednesday, 21 December 2005, at 5:28 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Mike Hara -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 4:09 p.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Eliot Feldman -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 1:27 a.m.

ADMIN! why Larry why?
Jason Burnell -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 12:15 p.m.

Re: why Larry why? *LINK*
Regina Hackney -- Saturday, 17 December 2005, at 1:05 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry Miller -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 8:29 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Regina Hackney -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 10:50 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry Miller -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 6:48 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Regina Hackney -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:20 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:22 a.m.

Because he's got a problem...
Phil Nebby -- Friday, 23 December 2005, at 3:13 p.m.

Re: Because he's got a problem...
Larry Miller -- Friday, 23 December 2005, at 4:18 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 7:24 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Jason Burnell -- Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 3:30 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:13 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Jason Burnell -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:38 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:05 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:30 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 2:59 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 3:17 p.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Garry Holmen -- Tuesday, 20 December 2005, at 6:22 a.m.

Re: why Larry why?
Larry "Iron" Smith -- Tuesday, 20 December 2005, at 7:55 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 7:09 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jason Burnell -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:29 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Garry Holmen -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:55 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Jason Burnell -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 10:51 a.m.

Re: The IPF rules aren't valid
Regina Hackney -- Monday, 19 December 2005, at 8:58 a.m.

Nope...
Eric Stone -- Wednesday, 21 December 2005, at 5:32 p.m.

Re: Nope...
Garry Holmen -- Thursday, 22 December 2005, at 8:16 a.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

USAPL Powerlifting Forum is maintained by Administrator with BBB .
The views and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of the USAPL.